Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4352G5U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4352G5U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 06:00
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 683
60% 509 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 184
Parallax 190
114% 171 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 170
Splatting 123
112% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 412 441 402 405 406 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 426
Mixed 294
SusWrite 403
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 32.8
115% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 265
215% 305 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 14
Mixed 20
SusWrite 16.1
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 40.9
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4352G5U Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4352G5U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback