Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 21:58
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 101
47% 75.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 294
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 842E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 46.7
31% 40 fps
MRender 49.3
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 33.2
34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 71 55 58 56 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 412
Write 340
Mixed 308
SusWrite 82.9
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 31.4
109% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 101
100% 160 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 82%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
51GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 44 12 55 55 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 367
Write 292
Mixed 275
SusWrite 78.3
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 20.8
98% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 40.5
51% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
738GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 191 193 191 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 135
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 192
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DBLT8GN128S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback