Packard imedia S3720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard imedia S3720  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard MCP73PV
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091014
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 22:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
Intel, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Memory 24.1
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 73.1
25% 45 Pts
4-Core 73.7
8-Core 74.8
10% 74.2 Pts
64-Core 76.1
5% 76.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 187 25 140 104 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.6% Average
Read 245
Write 190
Mixed 204
SusWrite 111
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 18.4
81% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 27.5
38% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
482GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 100 99 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 92.7
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 98.7
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M3 78T5663EH3-CF7 Nanya NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 292
14% 292 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3720 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback