Today's hottest deals

Medion Akoya E7227T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive7.78% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Akoya E7227T  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion Akoya E7227T
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 30 '19 at 18:23
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 138
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 237
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 20FA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.34
3% 5.62 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 44 44 46 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.78% Terrible
Read 53.1
Write 51.8
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 38.5
9% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 3.2
11% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 500GB
4GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 66 59 51 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 53.3
Write 53.9
Mixed 23
SusWrite 61.1
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.27 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya E7227T Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Medion Akoya E7227T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback