Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 18:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 338
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 119
Parallax 102
92% 111 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 103
Splatting 100
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 37 39 45 38 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 208
Write 103
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 63.6
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 10.5
49% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 23.2
DQ Mixed 16.3
13% 17 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 83%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 190 187 191 190 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 187
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 187
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HU564403EP0200 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback