Acer Aspire X3400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3400
Memory16.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 02:02
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 86.1
41% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 97
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 32.7
21% 28 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 26.7
25% 31 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 67 117 17 49 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 243
Write 191
Mixed 190
SusWrite 59
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 20.6
79% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 20.6
48% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
381GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 70 71 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71.3
Write 69
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 69
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
450GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 97
Write 13.5
Mixed 51
SusWrite 101
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3400 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback