Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 106
51% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 275
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.2
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 22.2
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 73 98 38 114 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 119
Write 101
Mixed 104
SusWrite 71.1
22% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 21
78% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 27.7
24% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
116GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 55 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 56.2
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 60%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
292GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 55 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 53
Mixed 46
SusWrite 56.1
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 49%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
144GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 84 87 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 87
Write 85.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 85.4
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback