Intel MAHOBAY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel MAHOBAY  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$84
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 58
2-Core 69
48% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 113
17% 122 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
279GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 3 3.1 2.3 1.9 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 71
Write 7
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 2.9
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 59%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 44 20 8.9 6.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 56.8
Write 55
Mixed 40
SusWrite 20
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 10
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAHOBAY Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel MAHOBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback