HP Spectre x360 Convertible 13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Spectre x360 Convertible 13  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 802D
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '16 at 14:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 95
2-Core 160
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 247
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 802D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 7.35
Parallax 6.88
4% 6.55 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE512HMJH-000H1 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT22H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 491
Write 378
Mixed 398
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 15.8
91% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 11.3
20% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 95%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
852GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 87.3
141% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EE-EGCE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Spectre x360 Convertible 13 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Spectre x360 Convertible 13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback