MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '19 at 07:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 133
57% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 292
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 4.69
4% 4.42 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 136 139 143 143 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 137
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 93%
Corsair Slider 3.0 124GB
66GB free, PID 1a06
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 13 15 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 14.5
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
86% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 51%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 135GB
25GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 20 19 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-E51(MS-7596) Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback