Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 5016R14

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 5016R14 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 5016R14
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130916
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 72.5 56% 80.9 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 198 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DD) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.59 2% 1.82 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.48 3% 2.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 123 64 71 68 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 322 Write 282 Mixed 240 SusWrite 94.2 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 9.6 59% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 82 DQ Mixed 11.8 21% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$65 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 220GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 69 70 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 53.3 Write 57.4 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 69.8 39% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 014F JM1333KSN-2G 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback