Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 06:14
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 660
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 109
Parallax 92.3
80% 100 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 92
Splatting 95.6
77% 93.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 185 187 190 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 384
Write 383
Mixed 198
SusWrite 190
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 26.8
100% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 185
170% 265 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
19GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 147 136 129 130 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 402
Write 218
Mixed 269
SusWrite 138
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 34.5
137% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 140
156% 265 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 116%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
219GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 123 130 134 134 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 432
Write 396
Mixed 363
SusWrite 140
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 19.6
94% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 33.3
63% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
581GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 86 85 85 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 91
Write 44.2
Mixed 47
SusWrite 85.9
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 168 171 172 166 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 108
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 171
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $746
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback