Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 128
49% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 219
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
AMD(1002 0123) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1013.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 3.46
Parallax 4.12
0% 2.54 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 54GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.3 3.3 3 2.7 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 8
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 3
5% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
262% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 61%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
528GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.1 5 4.3 3.7 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 7
Mixed 8
SusWrite 4.5
5% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback