Acer Aspire M3870

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3870 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer ET1861
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '19 at 13:19
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 104 49% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 852C) 2GB CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 43.6 Parallax 42.7 37% 43.8 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 35.7 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingsuxing 128GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02000005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 44 84 10 60 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42% Average	Read 249 Write 172 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 52.2 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 17.6 75% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 64.1 67% 114 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 81%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 85GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 67 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 72 45% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5474-010.A00LF 0198 99U5474-010.A00LF 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.3% Below average	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3870 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3870

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	6x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GeForce 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,147 samples	4x
GeForce GT 330NvidiaBench 5%, 845 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $15Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,517 samples	8x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 859B RM51264BA1339.16FD 0702 51264Y133I 80CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 12GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	2x
99U5474-010.A00LF 0198 99U5474-010.A00LF 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 10 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16