Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 4CoreDual-SATA2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 4CoreDual-SATA2 (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '15 at 13:01
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5800-$58 8,890 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 28.5 2-Core 24.2 14% 26.4 Pts	4-Core 47.4 8-Core 53.8 7% 50.6 Pts	64-Core 59.2 4% 59.2 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 82A2) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.83 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 2.12 4% 3.64 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 2.74 3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 213465171 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1644 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 160327810 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4709 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 824 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 27 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 63 521469982 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 60129542174 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 30 213465171 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 49108656069314 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3327953480 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2086022049	52.1% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 88.2 Mixed 61.1 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.12 27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 333GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 39690256 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3435 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 12447561 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2288 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 821 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 487850013 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 60129542173 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 25 39690256 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -68706591828866 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1815318671 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3744688840	52% Above average	Read 90.6 Write 90.5 Mixed 27.4 51% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.47 110% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 68%
WD 5000AAKS Externa 500GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 36GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 20.9 Mixed 19.5 28% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.28 45% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback