MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B38
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 14:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 118
50% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 190
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B38) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 10.7
6% 9.14 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 6.48
5% 6.49 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 54 40 47 58 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 306
Write 100
Mixed 122
SusWrite 74.4
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 14.3
51% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 34
27% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.6
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback