Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L655  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 122
50% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 159
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Toshiba(1179 FD12) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.38 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.97
Splatting 5.04
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 138 43 30 50 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 232
Write 176
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 76
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8.7
33% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 14.7
14% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5673EH1-CF8 M471B5273EB0-CK0 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback