Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 05:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$46
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 382
49% 371 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 360GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 39 20 115 35 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 401
Write 349
Mixed 22
SusWrite 95.7
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
12% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 85%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
632GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 24.6
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 24.9
31% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $493Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback