Samsung RC530/RC730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Samsung RC530/RC730 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RC530/RC730
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110810
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '16 at 15:17
Run Duration	101 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 19.5 2-Core 38.2 28% 38 Pts	4-Core 61.9 8-Core 86 9% 73.9 Pts	64-Core 97.1 6% 97.1 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0C1) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.6672 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 3.28 3% 3.85 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 3.73 Splatting 3 3% 4.26 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 21 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 83 3465 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7090 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4313 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 948 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5272 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 24156 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 201863921697 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3016 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 948 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 108075	37.6% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 67.3 Mixed 55.2 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.28 69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AM1U139C4P2-S12S 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.2% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RC530/RC730 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC530/RC730

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	101x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $230Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	50x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	28x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	138x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	56x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	10x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	31x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples	21x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363