ECS A960M-MV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	ECS A960M-MV (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '19 at 02:55
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 116 54% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 235 29% 220 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Lighting 7.73 Reflection 7.65 Parallax 2.69 6% 6.02 fps	MRender 6.76 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 6.61 5% 6.49 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Microsoft 가상 디스크 43GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 6.8 9 5.9 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 85.5 Write 79.8 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 7.9 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 247GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 55 55 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 132 Write 139 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 55.1 66% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 319GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 54 55 62 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 132 Write 104 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 54.9 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 88%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 250GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 53 54 60 58 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 109 Write 114 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 53.5 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 10 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960M-MV Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A960M-MV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	10x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	2x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	2x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x
ARC 100 120GBOCZ $82Bench 84%, 4,735 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16