Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory124 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 19:39
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 624
57% 480 Pts
64-Core 1,617
100% 1,617 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 32.2
21% 27.6 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 26
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 240 241 241 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 243
Write 234
Mixed 219
SusWrite 240
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 30.5
100% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 130%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
657GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 409 405 402 402 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 378
Write 378
Mixed 301
SusWrite 405
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 27
94% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 180
175% 276 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 101%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205
431GB free
Firmware: 1L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 110 110 111 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 110
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 92%
Amcc 9650SE-2LP 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 123 120 132 129 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 128
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.4
435% 3.5 MB/s
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 129 130 131 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 113
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
2TB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 103 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 105
155% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 36.1
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $330
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback