Lenovo 4180L29

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4180L29  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4180L29
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111128
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 12:45
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 98.9
40% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 186
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 69 84 88 100 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 73.3
Write 121
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 85.7
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.2
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
286GB free
Firmware: EC2ZB70W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 86 94 94 90 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 99
Write 97
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 92.6
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F1333 Kingston ACR512X64D3S16C11G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback