Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Memory 26.8 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 42.5 19% 31 Pts	4-Core 47.1 8-Core 44.8 6% 45.9 Pts	64-Core 42.2 3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 5470) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.94 1% 0.94 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 121 121 127 125 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.8% Below average	Read 206 Write 147 Mixed 190 SusWrite 125 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 13.3 36% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 115 88% 118 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11% Very poor	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 274 15% 274 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	15x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	9x
Pentium N3530IntelBench 35%, 5,111 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	30x

RAM
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GBCrucialBench 24%, 1,138 samples	4x
GKH400SO25616-1600 1x4GBUnknownBench 19%, 26 samples	4x
Team-Elite-1333 1x2GBTeamBench 18%, 98 samples	3x