Intel NUC7i5BNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIntel NUC7i5BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170724
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 15:14
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 172
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 290
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 5.87
0% 3.74 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.3
6% 6.55 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 196 199 199 196 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 362
Write 277
Mixed 379
SusWrite 202
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 41.6
147% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 326
314% 497 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 144%
Seagate ST2000LM006 HN-M201RAD 2TB
829GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 66
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 95.2
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Wireless 1TB
87GB free, PID a313
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 65.2
Write 44.7
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 63.5
72% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FHP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 25.5
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i5BNB Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i5BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback