Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 65.8
47% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 131
14% 112 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Sanyo(144D C597) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.48
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 277 275 278 280 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 427
Write 343
Mixed 276
SusWrite 279
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 25.5
88% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 222
167% 224 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 128%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
491GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 118 117 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 122
Write 87.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 116
63% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback