HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 21:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 121
60% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
HP(103C 179D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 2.81
0% 2.56 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 4.78
4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 47 47 28 40 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 64.3
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 38.7
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BF160B.D8FE 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback