Checkpoint QD-10-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory320GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 320GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCheckpoint QD-10-00  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory312.2 GB free of 320 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 06:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5220
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.3% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 140
56% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 560
49% 419 Pts
64-Core 1747
108% 1747 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 88 74 78 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 119
Write 103
Mixed 105
SusWrite 87.3
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20x16GB
20 of 24 slots used
320GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
152% Outstanding
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 78.6
MC Mixed 58.7
185% 64.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 152%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback