Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 599 58% 476 Pts	64-Core 759 47% 759 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Lighting 27 Reflection 25 Parallax 35.8 22% 29.2 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 31 Splatting 22.8 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 436 449 455 453 451 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 461 Mixed 316 SusWrite 450 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 41.7 148% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 149 150% 241 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 238GB free Firmware: 5B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 245 245 246 246 246 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	79.8% Very good	Read 252 Write 238 Mixed 231 SusWrite 246 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 43.6 154% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 112 97% 145 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 512GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 477GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 245 246 246 246 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	88.9% Excellent	Read 261 Write 246 Mixed 247 SusWrite 246 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 54.1 180% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 162 121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 36GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.8% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 19.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	496x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	305x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16