Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 41 1-Core 10.3 2-Core 19.7 18% 23.7 Pts	4-Core 20.6 8-Core 21.9 3% 21.2 Pts	64-Core 23.2 1% 23.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 1,583 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDC0) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.863.2.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.81 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: R010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 78 89 103 62 102 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.7% Very poor	Read 129 Write 110 Mixed 118 SusWrite 87.2 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 5.3 17% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-018.A00LF 1x2GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.82% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.8 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.82% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16