Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-124

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-124 (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Pumori
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '16 at 23:04
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-4500M APU 9,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 70.9 42% 61.6 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 123 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7500/7600 Dual Graphics 31 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB3B) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 4 4% 5.25 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 7.17 4% 5.25 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 192 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 48	60.9% Good	Read 484 Write 393 Mixed 448 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 10.9 44% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 9.06 31% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 334GB free Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1007 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6226 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6191 (0A) Spinup retry count 223 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3436 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 228 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 971 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 46010 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219043725349 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 64 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1917 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 257 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	51.5% Above average	Read 89.1 Write 90.4 Mixed 80.1 65% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.M8F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.2% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 9.1 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-124

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)