Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '19 at 08:06
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 208 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 374 51% 379 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 31 Parallax 38.2 32% 36.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 36 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 37 34 35 123 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.2% Above average	Read 212 Write 193 Mixed 239 SusWrite 55.8 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 26.2 99% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 292 214% 276 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB 10,780 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 719GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 152 146 146 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 150 Write 164 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 147 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.7% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 21 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	472x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	422x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	204x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $739

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16