Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-D3H R2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 07:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 112
2-Core 202
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 310
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 3.69
3% 4.12 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 9.65
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 256 257 256 238 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 257
Mixed 325
SusWrite 254
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 43.9
154% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 202
171% 250 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
443GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 167 182 178 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 159
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 177
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback