Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 181 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 675 59% 504 Pts	64-Core 1,684 104% 1,684 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% PNY(196E 12AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 166 Parallax 262 101% 184 fps	MRender 269 Gravity 216 Splatting 0.04 115% 162 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 118GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 84 85 86 44 82 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.6% Average	Read 85.3 Write 218 Mixed 193 SusWrite 81.3 33% 145 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 28.5 105% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 20.9 48% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Constellation CS 1TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: CN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 80 79 81 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 81.5 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 8GB free, PID 231b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 59.3 Write 39.3 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 64.1 67% 50.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.6% Very good	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 29.9 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.2 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $247