Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 22:50
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 31
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 123
40% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 400
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 7.12
0% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 6.87
5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$32
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 27 16 33 53 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 363
Write 208
Mixed 130
SusWrite 22.5
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 8.8
36% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 47.4
DQ Mixed 24.6
33% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC Adata 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.2
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 12.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback