IBM eServer x3400-[79766AY]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIBM eServer x3400-[79766AY]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM M97IP
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 14:57
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355
LGA 771, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 60
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 60.1
34% 50 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 243
22% 182 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled)
Asus(1043 045C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 63
37% 46.7 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 39.7
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 293GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 241 231 249 226 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 422
Write 306
Mixed 354
SusWrite 239
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 14
62% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 19.8
16% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%
PNY Opener 16GB
5GB free, PID 6004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 7.8 7.5 6.4 7.5 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 6.7
8% 5.22 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback