Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 16:46
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 995
97% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,627
101% 1,627 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 127
Parallax 141
108% 133 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
108% 137 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1335 1448 1490 1503 1495 1177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 1,488
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 1,408
301% 1,335 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 66.5
229% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 259
246% 366 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 232%
Great: 255%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 40
Mixed 18
SusWrite 14.6
19% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
156% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14%
Great: 97%
ASMT 2105 1TB
128GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 35
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 13.9
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB
92GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 36.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 1.6
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 56%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
801GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 37
Mixed 31
SusWrite 12.6
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 19.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback