Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	42.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 08 '19 at 16:06
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 150 2-Core 299 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 582 8-Core 1,143 102% 863 Pts	64-Core 1,182 73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 90.7 59% 78.7 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 73 Splatting 58.6 54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 312 322 325 325 323 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 2,497 Write 1,458 Mixed 927 SusWrite 372 289% 1,313 MB/s	4K Read 66.7 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 86.1 310% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 64 DQ Write 1450 DQ Mixed 800 608% 771 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 280%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 52GB free Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 133 75 93 47 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 503 Write 416 Mixed 418 SusWrite 122 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 1.2 49% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 1.2 51% 125 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 133GB free Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 467 461 463 454 461 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 474 Write 12.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 453 52% 239 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 17.6 99% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 1.3 71% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 3x16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3 of 4 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 31.9 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 44 SC Mixed 29.3 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 57.6 69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	511x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	453x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	376x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $895

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16