Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 16:30
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 868
86% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 96.2
56% 77.2 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 55.2
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,550
Write 2,363
Mixed 1,639
486% 2,184 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 90.5
309% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 936
685% 903 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
195GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 297 298 298 297 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 491
Mixed 418
SusWrite 318
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.7
217% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 200GB
177GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 38.4
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 37.8
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 3012 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 46.8
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 26.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 47.9
83% 47.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback