Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$153 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 58.9 37% 52.9 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 148 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 240GB SSD 400 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 81 62 49 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 303 Write 168 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 62.8 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 10.2 27% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 47.2 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 23.1 27% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 92%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-001CA0 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 399GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 105 95 82 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 107 Write 102 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 92.3 118% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 3x4GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	28% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	14x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $777