Toshiba SATELLITE C50-A-19T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C50-A-19T  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PT10F
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140422
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 22:13
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1005M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 53.6
40% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 69
8-Core 68.8
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 60.7
4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.22
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ACF050R 500GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AV001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 80 73 85 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 80.3
57% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 67%
FNK TECH USB CARD READER 4GB
1GB free, PID 0300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.4 2 2.1 2.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 2.9
6% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 9%
Mass Storage Device 268GB
216GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 13 8.7 8.6 10 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 10
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 10.9
9% 6.02 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C50-A-19T Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C50-A-19T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback