User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemECT
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B350-PLUS
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Eight-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 953
85% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
MSI(1462 3603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3077 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 195
Parallax 194
150% 191 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 180
Splatting 124
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 23 2.3 20 88 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 450
Write 294
Mixed 200
SusWrite 62.4
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 19.6
68% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 27
39% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
108GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 50 97 146 144 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 456
Write 362
Mixed 162
SusWrite 149
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 19.1
70% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 41.1
47% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback