Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 177 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 431 46% 367 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 2103) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 1.62 2% 4.01 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1 Splatting 4.48 2% 2.95 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 172 167 153 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 370 Write 393 Mixed 256 SusWrite 173 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 26.6 87% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 265 218% 314 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905417-082.A00G 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	377x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	208x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	111x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 3,305 samples	100x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	56x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $500