Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110223
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 10:51
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 457
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.7
32% 36 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 36.1
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 110 99 103 121 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 114
Write 130
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 104
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 31.3
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 18
36% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External HDD 2TB
158GB free, PID 0b13
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 30.3
Write 30.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 18.3
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.3
203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS1GLK64V6H Adata Adata 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback