Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 0.0292969 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 10:55
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 30.7
1-Core 2.6
2-Core 4.7
11% 12.7 Pts
4-Core 6
8-Core 8.4
1% 7.2 Pts
64-Core 10.8
1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 53 49 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 12.8
Write 20.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 52.4
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x62GB
1 of 2 slots used
62GB DIMM DDR2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.96% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.6 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 8%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback