Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '16 at 00:08
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 220
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 6.12
5% 7.15 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 14
7% 8.16 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitach HTS542512K9SA00 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB2O Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 48.8
Mixed 45.4
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.19
43% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 109
Write 16.6
Mixed 32.5
50% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.19
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.38
148% 3.59 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback