Today's hottest deals

Asus X550LN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus X550LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550LN
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 10:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 147
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 193
28% 203 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 131D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.51% Terrible
Lighting 13
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 10.1
11% 11 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 8.43
7% 8.96 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 315 325 329 331 331 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 302
Mixed 310
SusWrite 320
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 41.5
154% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 182
154% 220 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550LN Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback