Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 17:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 265
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 15.1
15% 15.4 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 12.6
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 321 334 328 248 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 363
Write 311
Mixed 307
SusWrite 281
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 18.6
89% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 196
173% 255 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 18.4
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback