Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-WW
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 11:49
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 412
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 58.7
56% 64.9 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 68.7
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As340 120GB 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 50 46 51 39 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 509
Write 381
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 56.7
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 11
124% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 22.8
77% 163 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
344GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 85 99 93 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 186
Write 99.7
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 86.8
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 878A 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-WW-CF Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback