Panasonic CF-191RAAHDE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPanasonic CF-191RAAHDE  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF19-6
Memory13.2 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 21:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 51.6
34% 49.3 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 215
20% 164 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.44 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.39
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 226 227 222 224 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 228
Write 219
Mixed 219
SusWrite 225
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 20.7
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 125
107% 159 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 64GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback