TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P61A-D3  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 11:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 206
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 391
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 80.3%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB; Asus PH-GTX1050TI-4G
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 42.1
32% 37.5 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 36.3
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 31.7%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: AP612PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 213 81 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 221
Write 211
Mixed 187
SusWrite 116
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 28.8
108% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 32.8
30% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 51.4%
 Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 134 145 145 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 43
Write 110
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 133
59% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 50.6%
 Great: 109%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
101GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 11.3
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 62.8
32% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 35.9%
 Great: 41%
Seagate Portable 250GB
109GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 11
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 13.5
16% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 9.03%
 Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GET.CPZ0C Kingston 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P61A-D3 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples69x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples57x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples48x
GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples32x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples29x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples26x
SSD
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GBWDCBench 44%, 768 samples21x
SSD 120GBGigabyte  $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples10x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples8x
RAM
KVR16N11/8 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 181 samples13x
KVR16N11/8 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 276 samples10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback