ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3 (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 11:02
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 206 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 391 53% 393 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB; Asus PH-GTX1050TI-4G CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 42.1 32% 37.5 fps	MRender 40.1 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 36.3 31% 38 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 120GB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 112GB free Firmware: AP612PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 213 81 62 63 62 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.4% Above average	Read 221 Write 211 Mixed 187 SusWrite 116 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 28.8 108% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 65.4 DQ Mixed 32.8 30% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 657GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 134 145 145 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 43 Write 110 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 133 59% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 109%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB 8,567 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 101GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 11.3 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 62.8 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 41%
Seagate Portable 250GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 109GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.03% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 11 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 13.5 16% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.03% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B1GET.CPZ0C Kingston 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.4% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-P61A-D3 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	69x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	57x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	48x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	32x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x

SSD
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GBWDCBench 44%, 768 samples	21x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
KVR16N11/8 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 181 samples	13x
KVR16N11/8 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 276 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback